Why do we not use “persons with impairments”?

The expression “persons with impairments” is often used in educational or medical contexts and places a stronger focus on individual health-related or functional aspects. It is sometimes perceived as a “softer” term.

For us, however, the term “persons with disabilities” more clearly emphasises society’s responsibility for inclusion and accessibility and is grounded in the relevant legal frameworks. Especially when it comes to participation, anti-discrimination and the removal of barriers, this term is more precise and carries greater legal significance.

Our aim

With our choice of terminology, we aim to:

• place the person at the centre, rather than highlighting their disability as their defining characteristic,
• draw attention to existing barriers and societal responsibility,
• and use language that is legally grounded, inclusive and respectful.

Language is dynamic

We do not regard our language practice as final or fixed. Language, like our understanding of inclusion, continues to evolve. We are therefore open to suggestions, experiences and feedback that help us continuously reflect on and further develop our communication.

Dialogue welcome

We would be happy to discuss this with you. If you have any questions or comments regarding our choice of terminology or our understanding of inclusion, please feel free to contact us.

You can also find our educational programme here.